Table 2 VR system evaluation. Means (Mn), standard deviations (SD), frequencies and percentages from participant evaluations of the VR system features comparing N = 64 Virtual Reality System Owners to N = 310 Non-Owners. Features were evaluated using a 5-point Likert Response Set: (1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Disagree/Agree Equally (D/A =), 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree)
Item | Own VR | N | Mn | SD | Disagree (1-2 s) | D/A (3) | Agree (4-5 s) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
The VR simulation exercise was realistic | Yes | 64 | 4.38 | .58 | 0 | 3 (5) | 61 (95) |
No | 310 | 4.32 | .58 | 1 (.3) | 16 (5) | 293 (95) | |
The virtual patients were realistic | Yes | 64 | 4.25 | .62 | 0 | 6 (9) | 58 (91) |
No | 309 | 4.21 | .63 | 4 (1) | 23 (7) | 282 (91) | |
The virtual patients responded to my commands | Yes | 64 | 4.06 | .85 | 4 (6) | 6 (9) | 54 (85) |
No | 310 | 4.07 | .73 | 14 (5) | 31 (10) | 265 (85) | |
I was adequately prepared to enter the MCI-VR subway station | Yes | 64 | 4.39 | .63 | 1 (2) | 2 (3) | 61 (95) |
No | 310 | 4.31 | .60 | 0 | 23 (7) | 287 (93) | |
I needed more time to acclimate to VR before entering the MCI-VR subway station | Yes | 64 | 2.47 | 1.13 | 44 (68) | 8 (13) | 12 (19) |
No | 309 | 2.77 | 1.12 | 155 (50) | 68 (22) | 86 (28) | |
The orientation helped me to master navigation through the MCI-VR subway station | Yes | 64 | 4.48 | .53 | 0 | 1 (2) | 63 (98) |
No | 309 | 4.37 | .59 | 2 (1) | 12 (3) | 296 (96) | |
Navigation throughout the MCI-VR subway station was challenging | Yes | 64 | 2.28 | 1.13 | 46 (72) | 10 (16) | 8 (12) |
No | 310 | 2.54 | 1.04 | 181 (58) | 71 (23) | 58 (19) | |
The medical kit contained everything I needed | Yes | 64 | 4.17 | .75 | 3 (5) | 4 (6) | 57 (89) |
No | 310 | 4.07 | .86 | 25 (8) | 25 (8) | 260 (84) | |
I found it easy to use instruments from the medical kit | Yes | 64 | 4.38 | .63 | 0 | 5 (8) | 59 (92) |
No | 310 | 4.18 | .74 | 12 (4) | 22 (7) | 276 (89) |